From y.umaoka at gmail.com  Mon Jan 12 17:20:53 2015
From: y.umaoka at gmail.com (Yoshito Umaoka)
Date: Mon, 12 Jan 2015 12:20:53 -0500
Subject: <i18n dev> IDNA2008
Message-ID: <54B40275.3050307@gmail.com>

Hello,

Does Java i18n-dev team own java.net.IDN implementation? The current 
implementation is based on already deprecated IDNA2003. JDK should 
support IDNA2008.

I found JDK-6988055 
[http://bugs.java.com/bugdatabase/view_bug.do?bug_id=6988055], but it 
looks there is no plan yet.

-Yoshito


From aleksej.efimov at oracle.com  Wed Jan 14 21:59:48 2015
From: aleksej.efimov at oracle.com (Aleksej Efimov)
Date: Thu, 15 Jan 2015 00:59:48 +0300
Subject: <i18n dev> [7u-dev] Request for review: 8037502:
 build.tools.javazic.Zoneinfo incorrectly calculates raw GMT offset change
 time
Message-ID: <54B6E6D4.2020504@oracle.com>

Hi,

Can I have a quick review please for the bug [1] inspired by already 
resolved JDK8/9 test failure [2]: this test uses a copy of JDK7 classes 
and check if the JSR310 generated data is the same as data generated by 
JDK7 code. The proposed fix [3] solves the possible incorrect 
calculations of raw GMT offset change time in JDK7 code.
Testing results: All JTREG tests somehow related to tzdata were executed 
and JPRT shows no issues with the tz related tests.
Adding the i18n-dev mail-list and JDK-8037180 reviewers.

With Best Regards,
Aleksej

[1] JBS bug: https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8037502
[2] JDK8/9 test failure: https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8037180
[3] Webrev: http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~aefimov/8037502/7/webrev.00/

From naoto.sato at oracle.com  Thu Jan 15 17:50:17 2015
From: naoto.sato at oracle.com (Naoto Sato)
Date: Thu, 15 Jan 2015 09:50:17 -0800
Subject: <i18n dev> IDNA2008
In-Reply-To: <54B40275.3050307@gmail.com>
References: <54B40275.3050307@gmail.com>
Message-ID: <54B7FDD9.40000@oracle.com>

Umaoka-san,

The area belongs to the networking group, so you might want to ask about 
it on net-dev alias.

HTH,
Naoto

On 1/12/15, 9:20 AM, Yoshito Umaoka wrote:
> Hello,
>
> Does Java i18n-dev team own java.net.IDN implementation? The current
> implementation is based on already deprecated IDNA2003. JDK should
> support IDNA2008.
>
> I found JDK-6988055
> [http://bugs.java.com/bugdatabase/view_bug.do?bug_id=6988055], but it
> looks there is no plan yet.
>
> -Yoshito
>

From masayoshi.okutsu at oracle.com  Thu Jan 15 22:50:01 2015
From: masayoshi.okutsu at oracle.com (Masayoshi Okutsu)
Date: Fri, 16 Jan 2015 07:50:01 +0900
Subject: <i18n dev> [7u-dev] Request for review: 8037502:
 build.tools.javazic.Zoneinfo incorrectly calculates raw GMT offset change
 time
In-Reply-To: <54B6E6D4.2020504@oracle.com>
References: <54B6E6D4.2020504@oracle.com>
Message-ID: <54B84419.6030301@oracle.com>

Hi Aleksej,

The bug report says, "The JDK7 code incorrectly calculates the raw GMT 
offset." Is there any example of the symptom in JDK 7? And there should 
be a regression test for the symptom.

Thanks,
Masayoshi

On 1/15/2015 6:59 AM, Aleksej Efimov wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Can I have a quick review please for the bug [1] inspired by already 
> resolved JDK8/9 test failure [2]: this test uses a copy of JDK7 
> classes and check if the JSR310 generated data is the same as data 
> generated by JDK7 code. The proposed fix [3] solves the possible 
> incorrect calculations of raw GMT offset change time in JDK7 code.
> Testing results: All JTREG tests somehow related to tzdata were 
> executed and JPRT shows no issues with the tz related tests.
> Adding the i18n-dev mail-list and JDK-8037180 reviewers.
>
> With Best Regards,
> Aleksej
>
> [1] JBS bug: https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8037502
> [2] JDK8/9 test failure: https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8037180
> [3] Webrev: http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~aefimov/8037502/7/webrev.00/


From michael.fang at oracle.com  Fri Jan 16 00:13:11 2015
From: michael.fang at oracle.com (Michael Fang)
Date: Thu, 15 Jan 2015 16:13:11 -0800
Subject: <i18n dev> [8u40] Review request for 8069122: l10n resource file
 update for JDK-8068491
Message-ID: <54B85797.2080900@oracle.com>

Hi,

Please help to code review the changes for the following CR?
8069122: l10n resource file update for JDK-8068491

The webrev can be found at: 
http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~mfang/8069122/webrev.00/

The only change is changing "http" to "https" in 2 files.

thanks,

-michael


From naoto.sato at oracle.com  Fri Jan 16 00:24:47 2015
From: naoto.sato at oracle.com (Naoto Sato)
Date: Thu, 15 Jan 2015 16:24:47 -0800
Subject: <i18n dev> [8u40] Review request for 8069122: l10n resource
 file update for JDK-8068491
In-Reply-To: <54B85797.2080900@oracle.com>
References: <54B85797.2080900@oracle.com>
Message-ID: <54B85A4F.7030601@oracle.com>

Looks good to me.

Naoto

On 1/15/15, 4:13 PM, Michael Fang wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Please help to code review the changes for the following CR?
> 8069122: l10n resource file update for JDK-8068491
>
> The webrev can be found at:
> http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~mfang/8069122/webrev.00/
>
> The only change is changing "http" to "https" in 2 files.
>
> thanks,
>
> -michael
>

From michael.fang at oracle.com  Fri Jan 16 00:28:10 2015
From: michael.fang at oracle.com (Michael Fang)
Date: Thu, 15 Jan 2015 16:28:10 -0800
Subject: <i18n dev> [8u40] Review request for 8069122: l10n resource
 file update for JDK-8068491
In-Reply-To: <54B85A4F.7030601@oracle.com>
References: <54B85797.2080900@oracle.com> <54B85A4F.7030601@oracle.com>
Message-ID: <54B85B1A.8080506@oracle.com>

Thanks Naoto.

-michael

On 15?01?15? 04:24 ??, Naoto Sato wrote:
> Looks good to me.
>
> Naoto
>
> On 1/15/15, 4:13 PM, Michael Fang wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> Please help to code review the changes for the following CR?
>> 8069122: l10n resource file update for JDK-8068491
>>
>> The webrev can be found at:
>> http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~mfang/8069122/webrev.00/
>>
>> The only change is changing "http" to "https" in 2 files.
>>
>> thanks,
>>
>> -michael
>>