<i18n dev> [OpenJDK 2D-Dev] RFR: 8162531solaris.fontconfig.properties needs updating

[Sergey Bylokhov]

The changes looks fine, should we increment version=1 to other version 
or it is not used? Unrelated question is how we validate all these paths 
if some of them are absent?

On 23.09.16 8:08, Philip Race wrote:
> PING .. any takers on this two week old RFR ?
>
> -phil.
>
> On 9/8/16, 1:12 PM, Philip Race wrote:
>> [Fix i18n-dev address]
>>
>> -phil.
>>
>> On 9/8/16, 1:10 PM, Philip Race wrote:
>>> Bug: https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8162531
>>> Webrev: http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~prr/8162531/
>>>
>>> Solaris 10 is not supported by JDK 9.
>>> This updates the fontconfig file to focus on the default set of fonts
>>> installed on Solaris 11 as part its desktop.
>>>
>>> Preference is given to the Arial, Times New Roman, and Courier New fonts
>>> that are included with Solaris, as well as other monotype fonts.
>>> Dejavau Sans is listed for some fallback coverage of less commonly used
>>> unicode blocks.
>>>
>>> 10646-1 encoding is referenced so as to reduce the number of entries.
>>> More UTF 8 locales were added since that is the default on Solaris 11.
>>>
>>> -phil.
>>>
>>>


-- 
Best regards, Sergey.