<i18n dev> RFR: 8257733: Move module-specific data from make to respective module

Erik Joelsson erikj at openjdk.java.net
Fri Dec 4 14:08:13 UTC 2020

On Fri, 4 Dec 2020 12:30:02 GMT, Alan Bateman <alanb at openjdk.org> wrote:

>> And I can certainly move jdwp.spec to java.base instead. That's the reason I need input on this: All I know is that is definitely not the responsibility of the Build Group to maintain that document, and I made my best guess at where to place it.
>> And I can certainly move jdwp.spec to java.base instead. 
> If jdwp.spec has to move to the src tree then src/java.se is probably the most suitable home because Java SE specifies JDWP as an optional interface. So nothing to do with java.base and the build will need to continue to generate the sources for the front-end (jdk.jdi) and back-end (jdk.jdwp.agent) as they implement the protocol.

My understanding of JEPs is that they should be viewed as living documents. In this case, I think it's perfectly valid to update JEP 201 with additional source code layout. Both for this and for the other missing dirs.


PR: https://git.openjdk.java.net/jdk/pull/1611

More information about the i18n-dev mailing list