<i18n dev> RFR: 8274879: Replace uses of StringBuffer with StringBuilder within java.base classes

[Andrey Turbanov]

On Thu, 7 Oct 2021 16:48:06 GMT, Naoto Sato <naoto at openjdk.org> wrote:

>> StringBuffer is a legacy synchronized class. There are more modern alternatives which perform better:
>> 1. Plain String concatenation should be preferred
>> 2. StringBuilder is a direct replacement to StringBuffer which generally have better performance
>> 
>> In [JDK-8264029](https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8264029)  I migrated only usages which were automatically detected by IDEA. It turns out there are more usages which can be migrated.
>
> src/java.base/share/classes/java/lang/Character.java line 123:
> 
>> 121:  * than U+FFFF are called <em>supplementary character</em>s.  The Java
>> 122:  * platform uses the UTF-16 representation in {@code char} arrays and
>> 123:  * in the {@code String} and {@code StringBuilder} classes. In
> 
> Not sure simple replacement applies here, as `StringBuffer` still uses `UTF-16` representation. You may add `StringBuilder` as well here, but I think you might want to file a CSR to clarify.

reverted changes in this spec.

-------------

PR: https://git.openjdk.java.net/jdk/pull/5432