<i18n dev> RFR: 8284780: Need methods to create pre-sized HashSet and LinkedHashSet [v17]

XenoAmess duke at openjdk.java.net
Wed Jun 8 17:40:43 UTC 2022


On Wed, 1 Jun 2022 17:34:04 GMT, Stuart Marks <smarks at openjdk.org> wrote:

>> XenoAmess has updated the pull request incrementally with one additional commit since the last revision:
>> 
>>   do it as naotoj said
>
> test/jdk/java/util/HashMap/WhiteBoxResizeTest.java line 441:
> 
>> 439:         }
>> 440:     }
>> 441: 
> 
> This unifies the test cases between the Set and Map factories, which accomplishes the primary goal. Good.
> 
> The unification is achieved through classic object-oriented polymorphism, which works fine, though which is rather verbose. This could probably be reduced with some tinkering on the model, but it's probably reaching the point where additional tinkering on the model isn't worth it. I'm ok with sticking with this approach for now. Maybe we can clean it up later, or maybe not -- it's at least fairly straightforward.
> 
> One issue that contributes to the verbosity is the repeated null checking. The null checking enables the test code to proceed and end up with -1 as the capacity if there's a null in there somewhere. This will cause the assertion to fail. This is good in that it will call attention to itself (as opposed to silently passing or something). However, if the test cases are set up properly, they should never run into null. If the null checking weren't done, an unexpected null will throw NPE, which will be caught be the framework and reported as an error.
> 
> That seems perfectly fine to me, so I'd suggest simply removing the null checking. That would also reduce the bulkiness of infrastructure.

@stuart-marks done.

-------------

PR: https://git.openjdk.java.net/jdk/pull/8302


More information about the i18n-dev mailing list