<i18n dev> RFR: JDK-8285932 Implementation of JEP-430 String Templates (Preview) [v7]
Jim Laskey
jlaskey at openjdk.org
Thu Nov 3 14:46:46 UTC 2022
On Wed, 2 Nov 2022 17:06:50 GMT, Jorn Vernee <jvernee at openjdk.org> wrote:
>> Jim Laskey has updated the pull request incrementally with one additional commit since the last revision:
>>
>> Add @SafeVarargs declarations
>
> src/java.base/share/classes/java/lang/runtime/TemplateSupport.java line 141:
>
>> 139: MethodType processorGetterType = MethodType.methodType(ValidatingProcessor.class);
>> 140: ValidatingProcessor<?, ?> processor =
>> 141: (ValidatingProcessor<?, ?>)processorGetter.asType(processorGetterType).invokeExact();
>
> Essentially the same as:
> Suggestion:
>
> ValidatingProcessor<?, ?> processor = (ValidatingProcessor<?, ?>)processorGetter.invoke();
Changing
> src/java.base/share/classes/java/lang/template/ProcessorLinkage.java line 60:
>
>> 58: * @throws NullPointerException if any of the arguments are null
>> 59: */
>> 60: MethodHandle linkage(List<String> fragments, MethodType type);
>
> I suggest changing the protocol here to be able to take all bootstrap arguments into account, and return a `CallSite` instead. That will allow a `ProcessorLinkage` to take the lookup and name into account as well, and allows returning e.g. a `MutableCallSite` as well.
>
> Maybe this can still be changed later as well though, since the interface is sealed.
Yes - this will all go away during preview.
-------------
PR: https://git.openjdk.org/jdk/pull/10889
More information about the i18n-dev
mailing list