<i18n dev> RFR: JDK-8285932 Implementation of JEP 430 String Templates (Preview) [v28]
Jim Laskey
jlaskey at openjdk.org
Tue Nov 22 20:09:11 UTC 2022
On Tue, 22 Nov 2022 18:33:23 GMT, Roger Riggs <rriggs at openjdk.org> wrote:
>> Jim Laskey has updated the pull request incrementally with one additional commit since the last revision:
>>
>> Seal Digits
>
> src/java.base/share/classes/java/lang/template/StringTemplate.java line 52:
>
>> 50: * given by the template expression.
>> 51: * <p>
>> 52: * For example, the following code contains a template expression that uses the template
>
> Though this is trying to explain the general mechanism, it might be more useful to readers to start with the most common use case, that of using a string processor. Swapping the order of the examples possibly.
The issue is that most users will not see a StringTemplate object. If they've come here then they want to see the inner workings.
> src/java.base/share/classes/java/lang/template/StringTemplate.java line 63:
>
>> 61: * {@code fragments} will be equivalent to {@code List.of("", " + ", " = ", "")},
>> 62: * which includes the empty first and last fragments. {@code values} will be the
>> 63: * equivalent of {@code List.of(10, 20, 30)}.
>
> Find a way to capitalize the first word of the sentence.
> Suggestion:
>
> * The value of {@code fragments} will be equivalent to {@code List.of("", " + ", " = ", "")},
> * which includes the empty first and last fragments. The {@code values} will be the
> * equivalent of {@code List.of(10, 20, 30)}.
Changing.
> src/java.base/share/classes/java/lang/template/StringTemplate.java line 66:
>
>> 64: * <p>
>> 65: * The following code contains a template expression with the same template but a
>> 66: * different template processor:
>
> Suggestion:
>
> * The following code contains a template expression with the same template but a
> * string template processor:
Changing. Missing "with" as well.
> src/java.base/share/classes/java/lang/template/StringTemplate.java line 75:
>
>> 73: * produced that returns the same lists from {@link StringTemplate#fragments()} and
>> 74: * {@link StringTemplate#values()} as shown above. The {@link StringTemplate#STR} template
>> 75: * processor uses these lists to yield an interpolated string. {@code s} will be equivalent to
>
> Suggestion:
>
> * processor uses these lists to yield an interpolated string. The value of {@code s} will be equivalent to
Changing.
> src/java.base/share/classes/java/util/FormatProcessor.java line 196:
>
>> 194: * <a href="../../util/Formatter.html#syntax">format specifier</a>.
>> 195: * StringTemplate expressions without a preceeding specifier, use "%s" by
>> 196:
>
> Its worth specifying the locale that is used by FMT, is it `Locale.ROOT`?
> If it is `Locale.default`, the results may vary from run to run.
Okay.
-------------
PR: https://git.openjdk.org/jdk/pull/10889
More information about the i18n-dev
mailing list