<i18n dev> RFR: 8323699: MessageFormat.toPattern() generates non-equivalent MessageFormat pattern [v5]

Justin Lu jlu at openjdk.org
Thu Jan 25 22:52:30 UTC 2024


On Thu, 25 Jan 2024 21:38:54 GMT, Archie Cobbs <acobbs at openjdk.org> wrote:

>> Please consider this fix to ensure that going from `MessageFormat` to pattern string via `toPattern()` and then back via `new MessageFormat()` results in a format that is equivalent to the original.
>> 
>> The quoting and escaping rules for `MessageFormat` pattern strings are really tricky. I admit not completely understanding them. At a high level, they work like this: The normal way one would "nest" strings containing special characters is with straightforward recursive escaping like with the `bash` command line. For example, if you want to echo `a "quoted string" example` then you enter `echo "a "quoted string" example"`. With this scheme it's always the "outer" layer's job to (un)escape special characters as needed. That is, the echo command never sees the backslash characters.
>> 
>> In contrast, with `MessageFormat` and friends, nested subformat pattern strings are always provided "pre-escaped". So to build an "outer" string (e.g., for `ChoiceFormat`) the "inner" subformat pattern strings are more or less just concatenated, and then only the `ChoiceFormat` option separator characters (e.g., `<`, `#`, `|`, etc.) are escaped.
>> 
>> The "pre-escape" escaping algorithm escapes `{` characters, because `{` indicates the beginning of a format argument. However, it doesn't escape `}` characters. This is OK because the format string parser treats any "extra" closing braces (where "extra" means not matching an opening brace) as plain characters.
>> 
>> So far, so good... at least, until a format string containing an extra closing brace is nested inside a larger format string, where the extra closing brace, which was previously "extra", can now suddenly match an opening brace in the outer pattern containing it, thus truncating it by "stealing" the match from some subsequent closing brace.
>> 
>> An example is the `MessageFormat` string `"{0,choice,0.0#option A: {1}|1.0#option B: {1}'}'}"`. Note the second option format string has a trailing closing brace in plain text. If you create a `MessageFormat` with this string, you see a trailing `}` only with the second option.
>> 
>> However, if you then invoke `toPattern()`, the result is `"{0,choice,0.0#option A: {1}|1.0#option B: {1}}}"`. Oops, now because the "extra" closing brace is no longer quoted, it matches the opening brace at the beginning of the string, and the following closing  brace, which was the previous match, is now just plain text in the outer `MessageFormat` string.
>> 
>> As a result, invoking `f.format(new ...
>
> Archie Cobbs has updated the pull request incrementally with one additional commit since the last revision:
> 
>   Change MessageFormat.toPattern() @implNote to @implSpec.

Hi Archie, thanks for the updates,

I did testing with some more edge cases, and everything still looks good to me. 

In terms of the CSR,

- Can you update the CSR with the `implSpec` tag as well? 
- Although definitely relevant, I'm not sure if the _special behavior_ section is too involved for a CSR. Perhaps you can move that section to a comment or make it apart of the description in the PR instead?
> After this change, the result of fmt2.toPattern() will be the same as fmt1.toPattern(). 
- While true, I think you should make it apparent that after the change, fmt1.toPattern() returns `{0,number,:'}' #0.##}` now, instead of `{0,number,:} #0.##}`.

Once you make these changes, I will mark it as reviewed by me.

-------------

PR Comment: https://git.openjdk.org/jdk/pull/17416#issuecomment-1911121617


More information about the i18n-dev mailing list