<i18n dev> RFR: 8333396: Performance regression of DecimalFormat.format [v6]

Naoto Sato naoto at openjdk.org
Mon Jun 17 19:43:12 UTC 2024


On Mon, 17 Jun 2024 18:47:11 GMT, Chen Liang <liach at openjdk.org> wrote:

>> lingjun-cg has updated the pull request incrementally with one additional commit since the last revision:
>> 
>>   8333396: Performance regression of DecimalFormat.format
>
> For StringBuf proxy, is it acceptible for us to introduce a new jdk.internal public interface (accessible only within java.base module) to expose common public methods in AbstractStringBuilder? We have public types extending or implementing non-public-types in the JDK (AbstractStringBuilder, NamedPackage) so I guess having a new module-specific superinterface would be fine? Need verification from API experts.

Hi @liach 
Do you know any other places within java.base where we would need the same proxy for StringBuffer?

-------------

PR Comment: https://git.openjdk.org/jdk/pull/19513#issuecomment-2174283589


More information about the i18n-dev mailing list