<i18n dev> RFR: 8342868: Errors related to unused code on Windows after 8339120 in core libs

David Holmes dholmes at openjdk.org
Wed Oct 30 06:05:08 UTC 2024


On Wed, 23 Oct 2024 04:40:50 GMT, Julian Waters <jwaters at openjdk.org> wrote:

> After 8339120, gcc began catching many different instances of unused code in the Windows specific codebase. Some of these seem to be bugs. I've taken the effort to mark out all the relevant globals and locals that trigger the unused warnings and addressed all of them by commenting out the code as appropriate. I am confident that in many cases this simplistic approach of commenting out code does not fix the underlying issue, and the warning actually found a bug that should be fixed. In these instances, I will be aiming to fix these bugs with help from reviewers, so I recommend anyone reviewing who knows more about the code than I do to see whether there is indeed a bug that needs fixing in a different way than what I did

src/java.base/share/native/libzip/zip_util.c line 1:

> 1: /*

Not my area but this fix looks reasonable.

src/java.base/windows/native/libjava/HostLocaleProviderAdapter_md.c line 970:

> 968:  // int got = 0;
> 969: 
> 970: /*

Don't understand this one at all - what did gcc actually complain about here? This code all seems used.

src/java.base/windows/native/libjava/TimeZone_md.c line 235:

> 233:         TziValue tempTzi;
> 234:         WCHAR *stdNamePtr = tzi.StandardName;
> 235:      // int onlyMapID;

Looks like this became unused with JDK-8209167, so deleting it seems fine to me.

src/java.base/windows/native/libnet/NTLMAuthSequence.c line 50:

> 48: static jfieldID status_seqCompleteID;
> 49: 
> 50: // static HINSTANCE lib = NULL;

Looks like this became unused with JDK-7030256, so removal seems fine.

-------------

PR Review Comment: https://git.openjdk.org/jdk/pull/21654#discussion_r1821924616
PR Review Comment: https://git.openjdk.org/jdk/pull/21654#discussion_r1821922770
PR Review Comment: https://git.openjdk.org/jdk/pull/21654#discussion_r1821929205
PR Review Comment: https://git.openjdk.org/jdk/pull/21654#discussion_r1821934247


More information about the i18n-dev mailing list