<i18n dev> RFR: 8364780: Ambiguity in DecimalFormatSymbols Unicode extension priority [v2]

[Naoto Sato]

On Thu, 7 Aug 2025 22:30:50 GMT, Naoto Sato <naoto at openjdk.org> wrote:

>> Justin Lu has updated the pull request incrementally with one additional commit since the last revision:
>> 
>>   reflect comments
>
> Thanks for cleaning this. This is definitely a leftover from [JDK-8186697](https://bugs.openjdk.org/browse/JDK-8186697). I think "cu" needs to have the same wording?

> @naotoj You are right regarding "cu"; updated the PR as such. I am wondering if NumberFormat should also mention "cu" as well then under its own Unicode Extensions section, (which I can include in this change).

I think so. NumberFormat can also be affected by "cu" extension.

> Let me know if the new wording changes make sense to you, or if you have a different way of implying that "nu" and "cu" both have priority over "rg" for their respective values.

The wording is fine to me.

-------------

PR Comment: https://git.openjdk.org/jdk/pull/26683#issuecomment-3166111072