<i18n dev> RFR: 8260555: Change the default TIMEOUT_FACTOR from 4 to 1 [v5]

[Leo Korinth]

On Fri, 22 Aug 2025 15:44:28 GMT, Albert Mingkun Yang <ayang at openjdk.org> wrote:

>> Leo Korinth has updated the pull request incrementally with one additional commit since the last revision:
>> 
>>   update testing.md, remove makefile link, fix bad text
>
> test/hotspot/jtreg/runtime/cds/appcds/LotsOfSyntheticClasses.java line 40:
> 
>> 38:  * @requires vm.cds
>> 39:  * @library /test/lib /test/hotspot/jtreg/runtime/cds/appcds
>> 40:  * @run driver/timeout=8000 LotsOfSyntheticClasses
> 
> I was expecting `500 * 4 = 2000`, instead of `8000` here.

This is another instance of ([double after quad ](https://github.com/openjdk/jdk/pull/26749#discussion_r2297765975)).

> test/jdk/java/util/HashMap/WhiteBoxResizeTest.java line 60:
> 
>> 58:  * @comment skip running this test on 32 bit VM
>> 59:  * @requires vm.bits == "64"
>> 60:  * @run testng/othervm/timeout=960 -Xmx2g WhiteBoxResizeTest
> 
> Why not `480`?

This is another instance of ([double after quad ](https://github.com/openjdk/jdk/pull/26749#discussion_r2297765975)).

> test/jdk/java/util/PluggableLocale/LocaleNameProviderTest.java line 34:
> 
>> 32:  * @build com.foobar.Utils
>> 33:  *        com.bar.*
>> 34:  * @run junit/othervm/timeout=960 -Djava.locale.providers=CLDR,SPI LocaleNameProviderTest
> 
> Why not `480`?

This is another instance of ([double after quad ](https://github.com/openjdk/jdk/pull/26749#discussion_r2297765975)).

> test/jdk/jdk/jfr/event/oldobject/TestObjectDescription.java line 49:
> 
>> 47:  * @library /test/lib /test/jdk
>> 48:  * @modules jdk.jfr/jdk.jfr.internal.test
>> 49:  * @run main/othervm/timeout=960 -XX:TLABSize=2k jdk.jfr.event.oldobject.TestObjectDescription
> 
> Why not `480`?

This is another instance of ([double after quad ](https://github.com/openjdk/jdk/pull/26749#discussion_r2297765975)).

-------------

PR Review Comment: https://git.openjdk.org/jdk/pull/26749#discussion_r2297768577
PR Review Comment: https://git.openjdk.org/jdk/pull/26749#discussion_r2297773391
PR Review Comment: https://git.openjdk.org/jdk/pull/26749#discussion_r2297773648
PR Review Comment: https://git.openjdk.org/jdk/pull/26749#discussion_r2297774209