<i18n dev> RFR: 8349200: [JMH] time.format.ZonedDateTimeFormatterBenchmark fails [v2]

[Naoto Sato]

On Tue, 4 Feb 2025 02:40:59 GMT, SendaoYan <syan at openjdk.org> wrote:

>> Hi all,
>> The JMH test "org.openjdk.bench.java.time.format.ZonedDateTimeFormatterBenchmark.parse" fails "java.time.format.DateTimeParseException: Text '2015:03:10:12:13:ECT' could not be parsed at index 17".
>> The `ECT` standard for "America/Guayaquil" - "Ecuador Time", and since jdk23 the `ECT` TimeZone.SHORT doesn't support anymore. Below code snippet shows the difference between jdk22 and jdk23:
>> 
>> 
>>         TimeZone tz = TimeZone.getTimeZone("America/Guayaquil");
>>         System.out.println(tz.getDisplayName());
>>         System.out.println(tz.getDisplayName(true, TimeZone.SHORT));
>>         System.out.println(tz.getDisplayName(false, TimeZone.SHORT));
>> 
>> 
>> - Java 22 output:
>> 
>> 
>> ~/software/jdk/temurin/jdk-22.0.2+9/bin/java ~/compiler-test/zzkk/TimeZoneTest.java 
>> Ecuador Time
>> ECST
>> ECT
>> 
>> 
>> - Java 23 output:
>> 
>> 
>> ~/software/jdk/temurin/jdk-23+37/bin/java ~/compiler-test/zzkk/TimeZoneTest.java 
>> Ecuador Time
>> GMT-04:00
>> GMT-05:00
>> 
>> 
>> This PR use `Z` TimeZone.SHORT instead of `ECT` will make this test more generic. Change has been verified locally, test-fix only, no risk.
>
> SendaoYan has updated the pull request incrementally with one additional commit since the last revision:
> 
>   Use PST instead of Z

LGTM. Thanks for the update

-------------

Marked as reviewed by naoto (Reviewer).

PR Review: https://git.openjdk.org/jdk/pull/23414#pullrequestreview-2593642191