<i18n dev> RFR: 8367031: [backout] Regression in serialization of LocalDate class objects

[Chen Liang]

On Wed, 17 Sep 2025 16:52:09 GMT, Aleksey Shipilev <shade at openjdk.org> wrote:

>>> > Is this a straight backout of [4ced4e7](https://github.com/openjdk/jdk/commit/4ced4e73fc0a517df826860839681004bb67e624)? Shouldn't this be `[BACKOUT] ...` issue then?
>>> 
>>> Yes, it is a straight backout; I can add the [backout] prefix to the regression title.
>> 
>> Cool. Sorry for being overly retentive here, but as per [Guide](https://openjdk.org/guide/#backing-out-a-change), you need to name it: `[BACKOUT] Change java.time month/day field types to 'byte'` ;)
>
>> @shipilev I can create a new issue with exactly the prescribed text. But changing the purpose of the issue that was filed to be a simple back-out seems like its loosing information.
> 
> No need to create new issues. Guide mentions "Alternative 2": you just convert this "investigation" issue into "backout" issue, and move it to be a subtask of the original issue. There is no loss of information, just a few metadata changes?

@shipilev FYI this issue already has a release note subtask, so the issue itself cannot be converted to a subtask. We might need to move the release note too.

-------------

PR Comment: https://git.openjdk.org/jdk/pull/27346#issuecomment-3303840514