Minor typographic issues

[Alex Buckley]

Hi Anthony,

Thanks for the comments. 'at' should indeed be 'as', and the line with 
four floating point numbers should have four spaces at the beginning. 
For some reason the spaces disappeared when I copied the program's 
output from a shell into the spec file.

The JSR 337 Maintenance Review finished on February 9 and the 
Maintenance Release material has been sent for hosting, so these changes 
will probably not appear until the Java SE 9 Edition. (There will be 
other errata, no doubt - please see section 1.5 for the feedback alias.)

Alex

On 2/23/2015 12:51 PM, Iris Clark wrote:
> Hi, Anthony.
>
> Thanks for reading the JLS, Java SE 8 Edition (http://docs.oracle.com/javase/specs/) so carefully and taking the time to send us feedback.
>
> Alex, please investigate these issues and let us know how best to proceed.
>
> Regards,
> iris
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Anthony Vanelverdinghe [mailto:anthony.vanelverdinghe at gmail.com]
> Sent: Sunday, February 22, 2015 7:35 AM
> To: java-se-mr-spec-comments at openjdk.java.net
> Subject: Minor typographic issues
>
> Dear Java SE Specification Leads
>
> I believe I have found some trivial issues in the Java SE 8 specification:
>
> On page 49:
> in the phrase "Rounding toward zero chooses at its result [...]"
> I think "at" should be "as":
> "Rounding toward zero chooses as its result [...]"
>
> On page 50, in Example 4.2.4-1:
> in the source code, I think the line
> System.out.print("gradual underflow: " + d + "\n "); should be replaced with:
> System.out.println("gradual underflow: " + d);
>
> On page 50, in Example 4.2.4-1:
> in the output, I think the line
> 3.1415926535898E-310 3.141592653E-315 3.142E-320 0.0 should have a space at the beginning of the line, in order to be in accordance with the source code:
>    3.1415926535898E-310 3.141592653E-315 3.142E-320 0.0
>
> For reference, the document I used is "The Java Language Specification, Java SE 8 Edition" as found at http://docs.oracle.com/javase/specs/
>
> Kind regards,
> Anthony Vanelverdinghe
>