From iris.clark at oracle.com Fri Oct 5 17:16:43 2018
From: iris.clark at oracle.com (Iris Clark)
Date: Fri, 5 Oct 2018 17:16:43 +0000 (UTC)
Subject: JSR 386 (Java SE 12) Specification -- DRAFT 14
Message-ID: <d868f1e5-25d0-430a-b9b4-5f6e2b45fd38@default>
Hi.
An updated draft of the Specification is available here:
https://cr.openjdk.java.net/~iris/se/12/spec/draft/java-se-12-draft-spec-14/
This draft includes the following changes:
- Annexes 1 and 2: Updates based on build 14
The next JCP milestone is PR. I anticipate submission to the PMO in early
November and publication a few days later. As usual with milestones, we'll
take a snapshot of the current Specification and submit it. I expect
additional DRAFTs before PR for newly Targeted JEPs, removed/deprecated APIs,
etc.
Links to the JEP/CSR Dashboards, latest Specification, latest JavaDoc API and
diffs, and latest RI binaries may be found on this page:
https://openjdk.java.net/projects/jdk/12/spec/
As always, feedback on this and other work in progress is welcome.
Thanks,
iris
From brian.goetz at oracle.com Thu Oct 11 14:45:25 2018
From: brian.goetz at oracle.com (Brian Goetz)
Date: Thu, 11 Oct 2018 10:45:25 -0400
Subject: Scheduling regular meetings
In-Reply-To: <8f86486f-fd8f-260e-7352-dd5065d887c4@oracle.com>
References: <8f86486f-fd8f-260e-7352-dd5065d887c4@oracle.com>
Message-ID: <b85589f6-5870-a26c-240c-a696b80647a1@oracle.com>
OK, having gathered constraints, I'm going to propose second monday of
the month, 7A PT / 10A ET, Jan/Apr/Jul/Oct, for these meetings.? Which
means we just missed the first one (bug or feature?)? If I hear no
objections, we'll go with this.
The primary goal is mostly to have an forum for talking through issues
that are not well-suited to handling on the mailing list. People can put
issues on the agenda by posting them on the list, or by sending mail to
Iris or myself, or propose them at the beginning of the meeting.
On 9/14/2018 1:09 PM, Brian Goetz wrote:
> I have been pretty bad about scheduling conference calls.? So, let's
> try this: let's try to do a quarterly conference call, which will give
> us two calls per release window, say Jan/Apr/Jul/Oct. Let's try to
> settle on a deterministic schedule (i.e., 9A ET second Monday of those
> months), and then we can get them on a calendar rather than running a
> time poll for each one.
>
> Please send me (privately is fine) any general constraints (times/days
> that are known good / known bad in general) and I'll try to propose
> some options in the intersection of gathered constraints that we can
> haggle over.
>
>
From Tim_Ellison at uk.ibm.com Thu Oct 11 21:25:01 2018
From: Tim_Ellison at uk.ibm.com (Tim Ellison)
Date: Thu, 11 Oct 2018 22:25:01 +0100
Subject: Scheduling regular meetings
In-Reply-To: <b85589f6-5870-a26c-240c-a696b80647a1@oracle.com>
References: <8f86486f-fd8f-260e-7352-dd5065d887c4@oracle.com>
<b85589f6-5870-a26c-240c-a696b80647a1@oracle.com>
Message-ID: <OF548EADCB.0F44D050-ON80258323.007581E4-80258323.0075A610@notes.na.collabserv.com>
Sounds like a plan - thanks Brian.
Regards,
Tim
"Brian Goetz" <brian.goetz at oracle.com> wrote on 11/10/2018 15:45:25:
> OK, having gathered constraints, I'm going to propose second monday of
> the month, 7A PT / 10A ET, Jan/Apr/Jul/Oct, for these meetings. Which
> means we just missed the first one (bug or feature?) If I hear no
> objections, we'll go with this.
>
> The primary goal is mostly to have an forum for talking through issues
> that are not well-suited to handling on the mailing list. People can put
> issues on the agenda by posting them on the list, or by sending mail to
> Iris or myself, or propose them at the beginning of the meeting.
>
> On 9/14/2018 1:09 PM, Brian Goetz wrote:
> > I have been pretty bad about scheduling conference calls. So, let's
> > try this: let's try to do a quarterly conference call, which will give
> > us two calls per release window, say Jan/Apr/Jul/Oct. Let's try to
> > settle on a deterministic schedule (i.e., 9A ET second Monday of those
> > months), and then we can get them on a calendar rather than running a
> > time poll for each one.
> >
> > Please send me (privately is fine) any general constraints (times/days
> > that are known good / known bad in general) and I'll try to propose
> > some options in the intersection of gathered constraints that we can
> > haggle over.
> >
> >
>
Unless stated otherwise above:
IBM United Kingdom Limited - Registered in England and Wales with number
741598.
Registered office: PO Box 41, North Harbour, Portsmouth, Hampshire PO6 3AU
From iris.clark at oracle.com Fri Oct 12 04:54:21 2018
From: iris.clark at oracle.com (Iris Clark)
Date: Fri, 12 Oct 2018 04:54:21 +0000 (UTC)
Subject: JSR 386 (Java SE 12) Specification -- DRAFT 15
Message-ID: <30b0d27c-fb09-407d-9465-b0342e48fe07@default>
Hi.
An updated draft of the Specification is available here:
https://cr.openjdk.java.net/~iris/se/12/spec/draft/java-se-12-draft-spec-15/
This draft includes the following changes:
- Annexes 1 and 2: Updates based on build 15
The next JCP milestone is PR. I anticipate submission to the PMO in early
November and publication a few days later. As usual with milestones, we'll
take a snapshot of the current Specification and submit it. I expect
additional DRAFTs before PR for newly Targeted JEPs, removed/deprecated APIs,
etc.
Links to the JEP/CSR Dashboards, latest Specification, latest JavaDoc API and
diffs, and latest RI binaries may be found on this page:
https://openjdk.java.net/projects/jdk/12/spec/
As always, feedback on this and other work in progress is welcome.
Thanks,
iris
From iris.clark at oracle.com Fri Oct 19 04:46:38 2018
From: iris.clark at oracle.com (Iris Clark)
Date: Thu, 18 Oct 2018 21:46:38 -0700 (PDT)
Subject: JSR 386 (Java SE 12) Specification -- DRAFT 16
Message-ID: <1dfebb12-5c75-4294-bcbe-1a3f6a9d48fe@default>
Hi.
An updated draft of the Specification is available here:
https://cr.openjdk.java.net/~iris/se/12/spec/draft/java-se-12-draft-spec-16/
This draft includes the following changes:
- Annexes 1 and 2: Updates based on build 16
The next JCP milestone is PR. I anticipate submission to the PMO in early
November and publication a few days later. As usual with milestones, we'll
take a snapshot of the current Specification and submit it. I expect
additional DRAFTs before PR for newly Targeted JEPs, removed/deprecated APIs,
etc.
Links to the JEP/CSR Dashboards, latest Specification, latest JavaDoc API and
diffs, and latest RI binaries may be found on this page:
https://openjdk.java.net/projects/jdk/12/spec/
As always, feedback on this and other work in progress is welcome.
Thanks,
Iris
From iris.clark at oracle.com Mon Oct 29 21:30:01 2018
From: iris.clark at oracle.com (Iris Clark)
Date: Mon, 29 Oct 2018 14:30:01 -0700 (PDT)
Subject: JSR 386 (Java SE 12) Specification -- DRAFT 17 / PR DRAFT
Message-ID: <3297ba6f-31e4-451b-a04d-8806a4ec4623@default>
Hi.
An updated draft of the Specification is available here:
https://cr.openjdk.java.net/~iris/se/12/spec/draft/java-se-12-draft-spec-17/
This draft includes the following changes:
- Spec, new Section 8 "APIs removed": Add File{In,Out}putStream.finalize()
- Spec, Section 9 "APIs proposed for removal": Remove
File{In,Out}putStream.finalize(); add params to methods
- Annexes 1 and 2: Updates based on build 17
DRAFT 17 is designated as the PR DRAFT:
http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~iris/se/12/spec/pr/java-se-12-pr-spec-01/
The only difference between DRAFT 17 and the PR DRAFT is the changed subtitle
from "Specification -- DRAFT 17" to "Public Review Specification -- DRAFT".
I anticipate submission the PR to the PMO later this week with publication
next week.
Links to the JEP/CSR Dashboards, latest Specification, latest JavaDoc API and
diffs, and latest RI binaries may be found on this page:
https://openjdk.java.net/projects/jdk/12/spec/
As always, feedback on this and other work in progress is welcome.
Thanks,
iris