Moving to JCP 2.11

[Iris Clark]

Hi, Tim.

I'm still writing up the minutes.  My work schedule has been absolutely packed the past few weeks but I see a clearing.  I hope to finish them in the next few days.  They'll be sent to this list.

Apologies for the delay.

iris

-----Original Message-----
From: Tim Ellison <Tim_Ellison at uk.ibm.com> 
Sent: Monday, January 21, 2019 2:24 AM
To: java-se-spec-experts at openjdk.java.net
Subject: Re: Moving to JCP 2.11

Apologies for missing the EG meeting.  If there are minutes, or a recording I'd be interested to have access.

I have no objections to moving Java 12 to JCP 2.11

Regards,
Tim

"java-se-spec-experts" <java-se-spec-experts-bounces at openjdk.java.net>
wrote on 15/01/2019 18:04:56:

> From: Brian Goetz <brian.goetz at oracle.com>
> To: java-se-spec-experts at openjdk.java.net
> Date: 15/01/2019 18:05
> Subject: Moving to JCP 2.11
> Sent by: "java-se-spec-experts" <java-se-spec-experts- 
> bounces at openjdk.java.net>
> 
> The JCP 2.11 process document has been ratified, and the Java 13 JSR 
> was launched under it.  Java 12, which was started on JCP 2.10, can be 
> moved to it mid-stream with the agreement of the EG.  It was raised at 
> the meeting yesterday that we should move to 2.11, with no 
> disagreement; for the sake of those who were not present, if you have 
> any objections to doing so, please make them!  Otherwise we’ll ask the 
> PMO to move the SE 12 JSR to JCP 2.11 on Monday, in advance of the PR 
> milestone.
> 
> 

Unless stated otherwise above:
IBM United Kingdom Limited - Registered in England and Wales with number 741598. 
Registered office: PO Box 41, North Harbour, Portsmouth, Hampshire PO6 3AU