RFR: 8194651: javadoc: mark the com.sun.javadoc API for removal

[Jonathan Gibbons]

Martin,

Thanks for the investigation and the update.  Sorry for the inconvenience.

-- Jon


On 2/10/18 8:20 AM, Martin Buchholz wrote:
> OK, I get it now. jdk tip needs 
> http://hg.openjdk.java.net/jdk/jdk10/rev/107413b070b9 *in the 
> bootstrap* to bootstrap with jdk10, but that is coming out as part of 
> jdk-10+43, which hasn't been released yet.  So this will fix itself 
> over time.  I can confirm that jdk tip bootstraps with jdk 10 tip and 
> fails with jdk-10+42.
>
> (It would be nice if it jdk bootstrap was less brittle)
>
> On Sat, Feb 10, 2018 at 12:06 AM, Jan Lahoda <jan.lahoda at oracle.com 
> <mailto:jan.lahoda at oracle.com>> wrote:
>
>     Hi Martin,
>
>     Does your JDK 10 build have the following fix?
>     http://hg.openjdk.java.net/jdk/jdk10/rev/107413b070b9
>     <http://hg.openjdk.java.net/jdk/jdk10/rev/107413b070b9>
>
>     I tried and the build indeed fails when using JDK 10 without this
>     fix as a bootstrap, but does not (seem to) fail when using JDK 10
>     with this fix.
>
>

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mail.openjdk.java.net/pipermail/javadoc-dev/attachments/20180210/a3a1beee/attachment.html>