RFR: 8193671: Default Methods tab under Method Summary includes static methods

Jonathan Gibbons jonathan.gibbons at oracle.com
Wed Jan 3 22:58:08 UTC 2018


OK


On 1/3/18 2:51 PM, Kumar Srinivasan wrote:
> Jon,
>
> Thanks for the review, good suggestion, updated the webrev:
> http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~ksrini/8193671/webrev-01/
>
> Kumar
>
> On 1/3/2018 2:11 PM, Jonathan Gibbons wrote:
>> Re:
>>
>> @@ -263,11 +263,11 @@
>> .addTab(resources.getText("doclet.Instance_Methods"), e -> 
>> !utils.isStatic(e))
>> .addTab(resources.getText("doclet.Abstract_Methods"), utils::isAbstract)
>> .addTab(resources.getText("doclet.Concrete_Methods"),
>>                          e -> !utils.isAbstract(e) && 
>> !utils.isInterface(e.getEnclosingElement()))
>> .addTab(resources.getText("doclet.Default_Methods"),
>> -                        e -> !utils.isAbstract(e) && 
>> utils.isInterface(e.getEnclosingElement()))
>> +                        e -> !utils.isAbstract(e) && 
>> utils.isInterface(e.getEnclosingElement()) && utils.isDefault(e))
>> .addTab(resources.getText("doclet.Deprecated_Methods"),
>>                          e -> utils.isDeprecated(e) || 
>> utils.isDeprecated(typeElement))
>>                  .setTabScriptVariable("methods")
>>                  .setTabScript(i -> "show(" + i + ");")
>>                  .setUseTBody(false)
>>
>>
>> Why is the new code not just
>>
>> - .addTab(resources.getText("doclet.Default_Methods"),
>> -                        e -> !utils.isAbstract(e) && 
>> utils.isInterface(e.getEnclosingElement()))
>> + .addTab(resources.getText("doclet.Default_Methods"), utils::isDefault)
>>
>>
>> -- Jon
>>
>> On 01/03/2018 08:34 AM, Kumar Srinivasan wrote:
>>> Hello,
>>>
>>> Please review simple fix for the above bug, most of the changes are 
>>> in the
>>> tests to eliminates warnings and the expected output.
>>>
>>> Thanks
>>> Kumar
>>>
>>> Webrev:
>>> http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~ksrini/8193671/webrev-00/
>>>
>>> Doc images:
>>> http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~ksrini/8193671/docs/api/java/util/List.html
>>
>



More information about the javadoc-dev mailing list