RFR: 8208484: color contrast issues in javadoc

[Magnus Ihse Bursie]

Looks good to me. 

The original css file was created by me, yes, but not much design work went into it. I think I just used a stripped-down version of formatting i found in some older html files, and converted it to a css file. 

/Magnus

> 30 juli 2018 kl. 12:53 skrev Jonathan Gibbons <jonathan.gibbons at oracle.com>:
> 
> The other/referenced bug only changed one of the colors that is changed in this webrev,
> 
> 119 tr:nth-child(even), tr:nth-child(even) th[scope=row] {
> 120   background: #E3E3E3;
> 121 }
> 
> But I note the other change is inline with the content of the
> standard javadoc style file:
> 
> jdk-default.css
>  77 a:link {
>  78   color: #4A6782;
>  79 }
> 
> javadoc stylesheet.css
> 
> a:link, a:visited {
>    text-decoration:none;
>    color:#4A6782;
> }
> 
> (Separately, I notice the a:visited colors are different, but that's a different issue.)
> 
> So, with my javadoc-dev hat on, it looks OK.
> It would be good for someone from build-dev to also review/approve this change.
> I note the content of the file was set up by Magnus [~ihse].
> 
> -- Jon
> 
> 
> 
>> On 07/30/2018 02:10 AM, Priya Lakshmi Muthuswamy wrote:
>> Hi,
>> 
>> Kindly review fix for https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8208484
>> webrev : http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~pmuthuswamy/8208484/webrev.00/
>> 
>> Have set a slightly lighter shade to background and darker shade for foreground.
>> This change is similar to https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8199893.
>> 
>> org screenshot:(/specs/pack-spec.html)
>> 
>> 
>> screenshot with changes:
>> 
>> 
>> Thanks,
>> Priya
>