RFR (XS) 8219691: method summary table head should be enclosed in <thead>

Jonathan Gibbons jonathan.gibbons at oracle.com
Thu Mar 7 22:29:53 UTC 2019


OK, thanks for the update.  The comment/behavior is noted, though. I've 
tried hard to make it easier to debug test failures, and first 
impressions from a "newcomer" are always valuable.

For my part, I find that running all javadoc tests is "fairly fast" and 
running any one test is "very fast", so it becomes practical to work 
through the first few reported issues in any test failure, and rerun.

-- Jon


On 3/7/19 2:23 PM, Derek Thomson wrote:
> Thanks Jonathan. This might have been a false alarm - I'm finding that 
> as I fix the errors caused by my change the other failures in the same 
> test seem to just disappear, even though they were (to my eye) 
> matching against unrelated sections of the HTML. Let me finish up, and 
> I bet it'll be fine after all.
>
> If any are left broken after that, I'll raise them here.
>
>
>
> On Thu, Mar 7, 2019 at 2:18 PM Jonathan Gibbons 
> <jonathan.gibbons at oracle.com <mailto:jonathan.gibbons at oracle.com>> wrote:
>
>
>     On 3/7/19 2:01 PM, Jonathan Gibbons wrote:
>     >
>     >
>     > If you are seeing tests that fail, I suggest you discuss them here
>     > first, before embarking on any additional campaign to get them
>     > working. Given the number of CI systems building and testing
>     OpenJDK
>     > on all platforms, I would be very surprised to hear of tests
>     failing
>     > in an unmodified repo.
>     >
>     ... I should be more specific:   if you are seeing tests failing for
>     reasons unrelated to your change ....
>
>     -- Jon
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://mail.openjdk.java.net/pipermail/javadoc-dev/attachments/20190307/d7950ae3/attachment.html>


More information about the javadoc-dev mailing list