Repeated lint option parsing and difference in behavior

[Jonathan Gibbons]

Yes, that is as I would expect. Much of the code was rewritten in JDK 9.

As for backports, the first job is to fix the latest version. It's a 
separate decision whether it should be backported.

-- Jon


On 1/11/20 6:50 AM, Dawid Weiss wrote:
> For the record -- Java 8 works as expected, Java 9 and on does not.
>
> Dawid
>
> On Sat, Jan 11, 2020 at 3:41 PM Dawid Weiss <dawid.weiss at gmail.com> wrote:
>> Thank you, Jon.
>>
>>  From what I can see on github this buggy scenario is fairly common...
>> I checked with Java 11 on and it's present in all versions up to the
>> most recent one. Should it be backported to LTS releases?
>>
>> Dawid
>>
>> On Fri, Jan 10, 2020 at 11:43 PM Jonathan Gibbons
>> <jonathan.gibbons at oracle.com> wrote:
>>> Filed
>>>
>>> https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8236949
>>>
>>> -- Jon
>>>
>>> On 01/10/2020 07:45 AM, Jonathan Gibbons wrote:
>>>> Dawid,
>>>>
>>>> Thanks for reporting this. If this is the case, it is a bug.
>>>> I'll investigate and file a bug if necessary.
>>>>
>>>> -- Jon
>>>>
>>>> On 1/10/20 7:12 AM, Dawid Weiss wrote:
>>>>> Hello,
>>>>>
>>>>> I just filed a bug for Lucene [1] but I can't explain why there is a
>>>>> difference between calling javadoc with several lint options:
>>>>>
>>>>> javadoc ... -Xdoclint:all -Xdoclint:-missing -Xdoclint:-accessibility
>>>>>
>>>>> versus aggregating them in one line:
>>>>>
>>>>> javadoc ... -Xdoclint:all,-missing,-accessibility
>>>>>
>>>>> It seems to me that the first version disables everything -- none of
>>>>> the lint options are running (no errors are reported) while the second
>>>>> version seems to work just fine.
>>>>>
>>>>> Am I missing something?
>>>>>
>>>>> Dawid
>>>>>
>>>>> [1] https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-9126