Handling type arguments from outer classes for inner class in javadoc
-
liangchenblue at gmail.com
Sat Jan 9 04:56:43 UTC 2021
Hi Jon,
I made a quick patch (attached) that renders the whole inner/nested class
chains. However, I am not sure if the behavior of the rendered text is
desired (i.e. clicking before . actually goes to parent class) and the
patch's side effects; it passes make test-only
TEST="jtreg:test/langtools/jdk/javadoc/*" though.
liangchenblue at gmail.com
On Fri, Jan 8, 2021 at 12:28 PM Jonathan Gibbons <
jonathan.gibbons at oracle.com> wrote:
> Filed as
>
> https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8259499
>
> -- Jon
> On 1/8/21 9:59 AM, - wrote:
>
> Hello,
> When I was creating tests for JDK-8259216
> <https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8259216> (namely this example
> <https://github.com/openjdk/jdk/pull/1997#issue-551504186>), I
> encountered another problem, where instance inner class parameterized types
> (generics) in javadoc omit outer classes' generic information.
>
> An example:
> Tree.java
> public class Tree<T> {
> public class Node {
> T data;
> Node left;
> Node right;
> // etc..
> }
> Node root;
> // etc..
> }
>
> User.java
> public class User {
> public void take(Tree<Integer>.Node now, Tree<String>.Node other) {}
> public void take(Tree<Integer> now, Tree<String> other) {}
> }
>
> Observe the javadoc method summaries (same for details) are
> void take(Tree.Node now, Tree.Node other)
> void take(Tree<java.lang.Integer> now, Tree<java.lang.String> other)
> while it's the most reasonable from the test code above that both should
> include the generic information.
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://mail.openjdk.java.net/pipermail/javadoc-dev/attachments/20210108/702509d9/attachment.htm>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: 8259499.patch
Type: application/octet-stream
Size: 7466 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <https://mail.openjdk.java.net/pipermail/javadoc-dev/attachments/20210108/702509d9/8259499.patch>
More information about the javadoc-dev
mailing list