RFR: 8273544: Increase test coverage for snippets [v3]
Pavel Rappo
prappo at openjdk.java.net
Fri Nov 19 17:49:26 UTC 2021
On Fri, 19 Nov 2021 16:18:25 GMT, Jonathan Gibbons <jjg at openjdk.org> wrote:
>> Pavel Rappo has updated the pull request incrementally with one additional commit since the last revision:
>>
>> Address feedback
>>
>> - Hoist the tb (toolbox) field to SnippetTester
>> - Use use default ctors instead of private no-arg ctors for test classes
>> - Re-implement SnippetTester.checkOutputEither on top of JavadocTester.OutputChecker.checkAnyOf
>> - Follow convention for jtreg comment
>> - Improve method names with underscores
>
> src/jdk.javadoc/share/classes/jdk/javadoc/internal/doclets/toolkit/taglets/snippet/Attribute.java line 61:
>
>> 59: * deletion without notice.</b>
>> 60: */
>> 61: public abstract class Attribute {
>
> General question: the commit message is:
>
>> So we can finally use sealed classes where they were originally envisioned.
>
> But, the code edits seem to be backing away from using sealed classes and interfaces. What happened?
This is embarrassing. The commit clearly contradicts its message, and I don't immediately understand why. I'll try to figure it out before integrating. Thanks for noticing!
-------------
PR: https://git.openjdk.java.net/jdk/pull/6359
More information about the javadoc-dev
mailing list