RFR: 8300517: Refactor VisibleMemberTable (method members) [v2]
Pavel Rappo
prappo at openjdk.org
Mon Mar 13 16:37:00 UTC 2023
On Fri, 10 Mar 2023 16:56:20 GMT, Jonathan Gibbons <jjg at openjdk.org> wrote:
>> We sure can, but that might complicate the patch even more.
>>
>> The beauty of assertions is that you can make them anywhere you like. Here, it nicely pairs with the `get` method suggesting that `map.get(x) == null` is the same as `map.containsKey(x)`.
>>
>> Also, please consider this commit as a big but still intermediate step: it sprinkles code with assertions to better capture what's going on (as far as we/I understand it), but eventually most structures, including `overriddenMethodTable`, will be replaced.
>
> Understood, but this is more about the general pattern for handling (any) bad values in (any) collection.
>
> Yes, you can check the values when you retrieve them, but then all you know is that _someone_ added/put a bad value, but not _who_ or _when_. In general, it is better to detect that bad value as early as possible so that you still have the surrounding context of _who_ and _when_ to help determine _why_.
Let's not complicate it now; that code will go away pretty soon anyway.
-------------
PR: https://git.openjdk.org/jdk/pull/12887
More information about the javadoc-dev
mailing list