RFR: 8325088: Overloads that differ in type parameters may be lost [v5]

Fri Apr 5 20:06:10 UTC 2024

On Fri, 5 Apr 2024 19:58:27 GMT, Jonathan Gibbons <jjg at openjdk.org> wrote:

> > Does this make sense?
> 
> While I am dubious about 3-tuples, your explanation makes enough sense that I accept your reply. Thanks for the explanation.

Yet another alternative notation, should we come up with one in the future. While I do believe that the erased notation is all we need, it has its issues, such as being lengthy and not very intuitive.

-------------

PR Comment: https://git.openjdk.org/jdk/pull/18519#issuecomment-2040546254