RFR: JDK-8325690: The scrollable element <div> with non-interactive content is not tabbable

[Hannes Wallnöfer]

On Wed, 21 Feb 2024 05:22:47 GMT, psoujany <duke at openjdk.org> wrote:

>> src/jdk.javadoc/share/classes/jdk/javadoc/internal/doclets/formats/html/resources/stylesheet.css line 730:
>> 
>>> 728: }
>>> 729: .col-first, .col-first {
>>> 730:     font-size:0.93em;
>> 
>> Is this actually necessary, and if so, where exactly? It seems that the elements affected by this change already have the following applied, which should have the same effect:
>> 
>>     .summary-table > div {
>>         overflow: auto hidden;
>>     }
>
> API doc(.html) generated using this stylesheet.css didn't had overflow: auto applied from .summary-table > div element but overflow been applied from .col-first, .col-second, .col-constructor-name which caused our achecker failure. .summary-table doesn't have affect.
> 
> Please find the below stylesheet.css used in one of our javadoc generated failed API doc
> 
> .summary-table > div, .details-table > div {
>     text-align:left;
>     padding: 8px 3px 3px 7px;
> }
> .col-first, .col-second, .col-last, .col-constructor-name, .col-summary-item-name {
>     vertical-align:top;
>     padding-right:0;
>     padding-top:8px;
>     padding-bottom:3px;
> }
> .table-header {
>     background:#dee3e9;
>     font-weight: bold;
> }
> .col-first, .col-first {
>     font-size:13px;
> }
> .col-second, .col-second, .col-last, .col-constructor-name, .col-summary-item-name, .col-last {
>     font-size:13px;
> }
> .col-first, .col-second, .col-constructor-name {
>     vertical-align:top;
>     overflow: auto;
> }

The current stylesheet has the following rule at line 688:


.summary-table > div, .details-table > div {
    text-align:left;
    padding: 8px 3px 3px 7px;
    overflow: auto hidden;
    scrollbar-width: thin;
}


Granted, the `overflow` declaration was added relatively recently (October or last year). Does the problem still persist with this?

-------------

PR Review Comment: https://git.openjdk.org/jdk/pull/17819#discussion_r1497700367