RFR: 8325433: Type annotations on primitive types are not linked
Guoxiong Li
gli at openjdk.org
Mon Mar 11 06:44:53 UTC 2024
On Sun, 10 Mar 2024 20:19:44 GMT, Chen Liang <liach at openjdk.org> wrote:
> Please review this patch that fixes the issue where type annotations on primitive types are not linked.
>
> Tested with file https://cr.openjdk.org/~liach/8325433-arrayanno/ArrayAnno.java
>
> import java.lang.annotation.*;
>
> public class ArrayAnno {
> @Retention(RetentionPolicy.RUNTIME)
> @Target(ElementType.TYPE_USE)
> @Documented
> public @interface Anno { int value(); }
>
> public void method(@Anno(1) int @Anno(2) [] @Anno(3) [] arg) {}
> public void method(@Anno(1) String @Anno(2) [] @Anno(3) [] arg) {}
> }
>
> JDK 21: https://cr.openjdk.org/~liach/8325433-arrayanno/old/ArrayAnno.html
> This patch: https://cr.openjdk.org/~liach/8325433-arrayanno/new/ArrayAnno.html
>
> Note that a bug within javac causes the annotations to become `@Anno(1) String @Anno(3) [] @Anno(2) []` in the output files; this bug also affects output class files so I assume this is a bug within javac's tree building. (Intersting, the buggy javadoc output was copied wholesale in the original `TestTypeAnnotations` output for `array2Deep` cases, but no one paid attention to it)
Changes requested by gli (Committer).
test/langtools/jdk/javadoc/doclet/testTypeAnnotations/typeannos/Fields.java line 72:
> 70:
> 71: public final @FldA int primitive = 0;
> 72: public final @FldA int @FldB [] primitiveArray1Deep = null;
These two fields have not been verified?
test/langtools/jdk/javadoc/doclet/testTypeAnnotations/typeannos/MethodReturnType.java line 54:
> 52:
> 53: @MRtnA int primitive() { return 0; }
> 54: @MRtnA int @MRtnB [] primitiveArray1Deep() { return null; }
These two fields have not been verified?
-------------
PR Review: https://git.openjdk.org/jdk/pull/18179#pullrequestreview-1927016081
PR Review Comment: https://git.openjdk.org/jdk/pull/18179#discussion_r1519212039
PR Review Comment: https://git.openjdk.org/jdk/pull/18179#discussion_r1519212869
More information about the javadoc-dev
mailing list