RFR: 8349369: test/docs/jdk/javadoc/doccheck/checks/jdkCheckLinks.java did not report on missing man page files
Chen Liang
liach at openjdk.org
Tue Mar 4 02:17:55 UTC 2025
On Tue, 18 Feb 2025 17:11:33 GMT, Hannes Wallnöfer <hannesw at openjdk.org> wrote:
>> Please review this small update to make the test more robust, the test did not always check links to other files if they did not contain a fragment or a `#`symbol.
>>
>> I'd like to add that the original [doccheck](https://github.com/openjdk/doccheck) also didn't pick up on these missing files when I ran it.
>>
>> TIA
>
> test/docs/jdk/javadoc/doccheck/doccheckutils/checkers/LinkChecker.java line 227:
>
>> 225: && missingFiles == 0
>> 226: && badSchemes == 0
>> 227: && log.noErrors();
>
> So we have both these counters and the `log` instance to track errors. Shouldn't the `missingIds` counter have bee increased when the error was logged?
Indeed, would be much better if we can just check `log.noErrors()`.
-------------
PR Review Comment: https://git.openjdk.org/jdk/pull/23441#discussion_r1978498602
More information about the javadoc-dev
mailing list