RFR: 8367007: javadoc generation of JavaFX docs fails after fix for JDK-8350920
Nizar Benalla
nbenalla at openjdk.org
Wed Sep 10 16:27:52 UTC 2025
On Tue, 9 Sep 2025 10:16:42 GMT, Hannes Wallnöfer <hannesw at openjdk.org> wrote:
> Please review a change to fix a regression when documenting inherited JavaFX property members after [JDK-8350920](https://bugs.openjdk.org/browse/JDK-8350920). The wrong `PropertyHelper` instance was used to initialize synthetic doc comments on property members, leading to potentially missing comments.
>
> Since using the correct `PropertyHelper` instance would have led to property info being computed multiple times (previously it was only needed in `ClassWriter`), I added caching of `PropertyHelper` instances in the enclosing `PropertyUtils` instance. In the process I also removed some unnecessary fields from `PropertyHelper`, made the property member map lazily initialized, and cleaned up code and doc comments in `PropertyUtils` a bit.
>
> The test adds a new subclass to a property-holding class in `TestJavaFX` to make sure inherited property members are documented correctly and no warnings are issued for missing synthetic doc comments.
I think this looks fine.
-------------
Marked as reviewed by nbenalla (Committer).
PR Review: https://git.openjdk.org/jdk/pull/27168#pullrequestreview-3206909627
More information about the javadoc-dev
mailing list