RFR: 8372948: Store end positions directly in JCTree [v11]

Liam Miller-Cushon cushon at openjdk.org
Tue Feb 3 11:55:06 UTC 2026


On Tue, 3 Feb 2026 10:23:32 GMT, Liam Miller-Cushon <cushon at openjdk.org> wrote:

>> This change adds a field to `JCTree` to store end positions, instead of using a separate `EndPosTable` map. See also [this compiler-dev@ thread](https://mail.openjdk.org/pipermail/compiler-dev/2025-November/032254.html).
>> 
>> I performed the refactoring in stages, preserving existing semantics at each step.
>> 
>> There are two known places where this changes existing behaviour that are reflected in changes to tests:
>> 
>> * `test/langtools/tools/javac/api/TestJavacTask_Lock.java` - this test asserts that calling `JavacTask#parse` first and then calling `#call` or `#parse` second will fail. The assertion that the test is currently expecting is thrown when the `EndPosTable` gets set a second time, and this change means that no longer results in an exception. If desired `JavacTask#parse` could be updated to explicitly check if it is called twice and fail, instead of indirectly relying on the `EndPosTable` for that.
>> 
>> * `test/langtools/tools/javac/diags/DiagnosticGetEndPosition.java` - there's a comment that 'ideally would be "0", but the positions are not fully set yet', and with the new approach the end position is available to the test, so it resolves the comment. Also the test logic didn't handle platform specific line ending variations correctly, so I updated it to work on windows now that end positions are present.
>
> Liam Miller-Cushon has updated the pull request incrementally with one additional commit since the last revision:
> 
>   Remove overload of ParserFactor#newParser

Thanks for the reviews!

There were two references to `newParser` I missed updated earlier, which I have now fixed. I also merged in the latest changes from master, and double checked that tier1 is still passing.

-------------

PR Comment: https://git.openjdk.org/jdk/pull/28610#issuecomment-3840858526


More information about the javadoc-dev mailing list