FW: is this a bug ?
Andrew Haley
aph at redhat.com
Wed Oct 16 09:39:22 UTC 2019
On 10/16/19 10:22 AM, Aleksey Shipilev wrote:
> That would be weird.
>
> The fixed test accesses DBB at offset 0, so the underlying storage (returned by
> Unsafe.allocateMemory) has to be unaligned in that case.
It'd be aligned because Unsafe_AllocateMemory0 uses malloc().
malloc() is aligned, by definition.
> This fixes the testbug and gets the proper behavior, apparently?
>
> But then ByteBufferViewsAtomicityTests should crash the same way,
> no? And that would be odd, as JVM crash is not the expected behavior
> in this case.
I didn't read about a JVM crash.
> It surely is understandable, but not expected.
--
Andrew Haley (he/him)
Java Platform Lead Engineer
Red Hat UK Ltd. <https://www.redhat.com>
https://keybase.io/andrewhaley
EAC8 43EB D3EF DB98 CC77 2FAD A5CD 6035 332F A671
More information about the jcstress-dev
mailing list