RFR: 7904028: jcstress: Address s.m.Unsafe use warnings which fail build on JDK 23+

Chen Liang liach at openjdk.org
Tue Jun 10 13:31:43 UTC 2025


On Sun, 8 Jun 2025 22:22:37 GMT, Pavel Rappo <prappo at openjdk.org> wrote:

> Here I propose a simple, symptomatic solution to fix build failures on JDK 23+ caused by treating "deprecated for removal" warnings as errors.
> 
> In the patch, I tried to keep the scope of `@SuppressWarnings` to a minimum. However, in a few cases I had to broaden it. This is because this annotation cannot be applied to a static initializer or an assignment within it.
> 
> Instead of extracting code into methods for the sake of annotating those, I annotated the smallest annotatable outer element, which was the top-level class. For example, see: `UnsafeBusyLoopTest`, `UnsafeAddLong1`, `UnsafeAddLong42`. 
> 
> I note that in JBS @shipilev suggested another approach to address the warnings. Namely, to move from `Unsafe` to `VarHandle`. However, such an approach is beyond my competence. And if chosen, it should be done by someone else. Thanks.

We might need to consider bumping the source and target of jcstress so we can move these fences to use the VarHandle ones.

-------------

PR Comment: https://git.openjdk.org/jcstress/pull/165#issuecomment-2959272430


More information about the jcstress-dev mailing list