Example of a Flow-based JDBC API

Viktor Klang v at lightbend.com
Sun Oct 29 13:19:21 UTC 2017


On Sun, Oct 29, 2017 at 2:17 PM, Viktor Klang <v at lightbend.com> wrote:

>
>
> On Sat, Oct 28, 2017 at 1:35 AM, Douglas Surber <douglas.surber at oracle.com
> > wrote:
>
>>
>> On Oct 27, 2017, at 4:05 PM, Viktor Klang <v at lightbend.com> wrote:
>>
>> Answers in line
>>
>> On Wed, Oct 25, 2017 at 4:06 PM, Douglas Surber <douglas.surber at oracle.
>> com> wrote:
>>
>>>
>>>
>>
>>> No implementations are required, only the API being included in Java
>>> 19.x.
>>>
>>
>> Isn't there a real risk that it will be hard to vet the implementability
>> without at the very least one implementation?
>>
>>
>> Oracle has an internal prototype implementation for the Oracle Database
>> that is asynchronous all the way down so we are confident that this is
>> implementable. This prototype has two purposes: 1) demonstrate that the API
>> is implementable, 2) actually run sample code to test the usability of the
>> API. Management is currently unwilling to release this prototype for public
>> use, but that may change.
>>
>
> I would suggest that having a prototype implementation as a part of the
> ADBA is highly desirable—otherwise there's a real risk that A) it is not
> possible to verify whether proposals will impact implementability
> positively or negatively.
>



> B) Having a hidden codebase makes for little conversation. Also, having
> that codebase makes it possible for end-to-end testing on a build and
> CI-basis, which means shorter feedback loops and shorter time from idea to
> PoC.
>

Edit: added B-case :)


>
>
>>
>> There have been forum posts from a few folks suggesting efforts to
>> implement ADBA. We hope one or more of those efforts is successful and look
>> forward to any feedback.
>>
>> Douglas
>>
>
>
>
> --
> Cheers,
>>
> ——————
> *Viktor Klang*
> Deputy CTO
> Lightbend, Inc.
>
>
>


-- 
Cheers,
√

——————
*Viktor Klang*
Deputy CTO
Lightbend, Inc.


More information about the jdbc-spec-discuss mailing list