ADBA feedback

[Lance Andersen]

Maybe sync up with Dave Cramer.  Please see https://github.com/pgjdbc/AoJ/ <https://github.com/pgjdbc/AoJ/>


> On Apr 27, 2018, at 11:53 AM, Mark Rotteveel <mark at lawinegevaar.nl> wrote:
> 
> On 27-4-2018 16:36, Douglas Surber wrote:
>> The world doesn’t need more than one implementation of AoJ. AoJ is purely a descriptive name; there is nothing creative about it. Perhaps our biggest goal in creating AoJ was to jump start a community project to create an AoJ implementation. So a community AoJ fork could (should) use the AoJ name though a different package.
> 
> I think idea this has a bootstrapping problem. There needs to be one such initiative (and - hopefully - only one), and there needs to be sufficient traction for that to remain alive.
> 
> I'm willing to create an organization on GitHub that contains such a fork, but - partly due to health issues - I really don't have the time and energy to be very actively contributing or involved in that for the foreseeable future. And that can easily be the downfall of such a fork.
> 
> Would there be any objections to create a GitHub organization called adba-community, or maybe jdbc-community (which would allow it to be broader than just AoJ and ADBA)?
> 
> Mark
> -- 
> Mark Rotteveel

 <http://oracle.com/us/design/oracle-email-sig-198324.gif>
 <http://oracle.com/us/design/oracle-email-sig-198324.gif> <http://oracle.com/us/design/oracle-email-sig-198324.gif>
 <http://oracle.com/us/design/oracle-email-sig-198324.gif>Lance Andersen| Principal Member of Technical Staff | +1.781.442.2037
Oracle Java Engineering 
1 Network Drive 
Burlington, MA 01803
Lance.Andersen at oracle.com <mailto:Lance.Andersen at oracle.com>