New candidate JEP: 336: Deprecate the Pack200 Tools and API
Peter
jini at zeus.net.au
Sat Jun 9 23:41:57 UTC 2018
Could this tool be supported by the community, separate from the Java
release cycle?
We'd certainly adopt it over at Apache if you'd consider relicensing it?
Only since IPv6 adoption has in increased, has it been practical to use
distributed peer to peer computing over the internet. This isn't just
for clients like java webstart.
Some recent developments in our software (an evolution / refactoring of
Jini):
* IPv6 Multicast discovery (including global multicast announcement,
but not request, to avoid DOS).
* Https discovery
* A safe lookup service, allows authentication and delayed
unmarshalling of service proxy's.
* A security focused reimplementation of Java Serialization.
* RFC3986 URI support.
* An Invocation Layer Factory (AtomicILFactory) that utilises secure
deserialization, and supports OSGi and other modular environments,
class resolution is determined by ClassLoader's, codebase
annotations are no longer used for determining class visibility,
only to located and download code. AtomicILFactory is used by
Jini Extensible Remote Invocation - based on JSR 76 and JSR78
Regards,
Peter.
On 9/06/2018 7:05 PM, Peter wrote:
> On 7/06/2018 6:54 AM, mark.reinhold at oracle.com wrote:
>> http://openjdk.java.net/jeps/336
>>
>> - Mark
>
> Hmm, a bit dissapointing, I would have liked to see its support
> continued. Small and compact jar files are still important for
> distributed systems, although now we tend to maintain local mirror
> repositories, it's a change we'll have to live with I guess.
>
> How long before it will be removed completely?
>
> We ran tests on Java 9 pre releases, but haven't migrated from Java 8
> yet.
>
> Peter.
>
>
>
>
More information about the jdk-dev
mailing list