JEP proposed to target JDK 11: 336: Deprecate the Pack200 Tools and API

[Daniel Megert]

Sorry, didn't see your reply.

> Is Eclipse willing to sign up to maintain this technology?

If someone steps up to do so, yes. I think Peter has interest to do so. 
The question is: is it legally allowed to implement and ship a deprecated 
specification?

Dani



From:   Daniel Megert/Zurich/IBM
To:     mark.reinhold at oracle.com
Date:   15.06.2018 08:51
Subject:        Re: JEP proposed to target JDK 11: 336: Deprecate the 
Pack200 Tools and API


Hi Mark

Can you please comment on 
http://mail.openjdk.java.net/pipermail/jdk-dev/2018-June/001382.html.

Dani




From:   mark.reinhold at oracle.com
To:     jdk-dev at openjdk.java.net
Date:   15.06.2018 01:07
Subject:        Re: JEP proposed to target JDK 11: 336: Deprecate the 
Pack200 Tools and API
Sent by:        "jdk-dev" <jdk-dev-bounces at openjdk.java.net>



2018/6/7 15:35:15 -0700, mark.reinhold at oracle.com:
> The following JEP is proposed to target JDK 11:
> 
>   336: Deprecate the Pack200 Tools and API
>        
http://openjdk.java.net/jeps/336

> 
> Feedback on this proposal is more than welcome, as are reasoned
> objections.  If no such objections are raised by 23:00 UTC on Thursday,
> 14 June, or if they're raised and then satisfactorily answered, then
> per the JEP 2.0 process proposal [1] I'll target this JEP to JDK 11.

Hearing no objections, I?ve targeted this JEP to JDK 11.

- Mark