Introducing time wasters
apr at jpos.org
Thu Sep 20 18:31:18 UTC 2018
Why not 'nasty'? It's a nasty bug, after all.
On Thu, Sep 20, 2018 at 3:14 PM, Florian Weimer <fweimer at redhat.com> wrote:
> * Aleksey Shipilev:
> > dev-hard implies "this requires hard development"?
> > Probably, the variant of "critical-for-dev-experience" to turn the
> > whole thing positive.
> I think the point is the internal impact. Presumably it's like a test
> blocker, except that it's possible to work around once understood (but
> then the time waste has already occurred).
> I'm not sure if such bugs are automatically urgent. It's true that the
> fix will quickly pay for itself, but that doesn't really tell us much
> about priority and severity of the issue (and the difficulty of the fix
More information about the jdk-dev