Can JDK-8210776 be made public?

[Lindenmaier, Goetz]

Hi Phil,

thanks for opening the bug!

Best regards,
  Goetz.

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Philip Race <philip.race at oracle.com>
> Sent: Freitag, 22. November 2019 00:08
> To: Langer, Christoph <christoph.langer at sap.com>
> Cc: Lindenmaier, Goetz <goetz.lindenmaier at sap.com>;
> jesper.wilhelmsson at oracle.com; jdk-dev at openjdk.java.net
> Subject: Re: Can JDK-8210776 be made public?
> 
> Ok. Makes sense. It is now open.
> 
> -phil.
> 
> On 11/21/19, 1:59 PM, Langer, Christoph wrote:
> > Hi Phil,
> >
> > yes, please open it.
> >
> > It's not so much about the content but the process of backporting would be
> easier. Then we could place fix-request labels on the bug and backports would
> get linked to it.
> >
> > It would be much appreciated.
> >
> > Thanks
> > Christoph
> >
> >> -----Original Message-----
> >> From: jdk-dev<jdk-dev-bounces at openjdk.java.net>  On Behalf Of Phil Race
> >> Sent: Donnerstag, 21. November 2019 20:01
> >> To: Lindenmaier, Goetz<goetz.lindenmaier at sap.com>;
> >> jesper.wilhelmsson at oracle.com
> >> Cc: jdk-dev at openjdk.java.net
> >> Subject: Re: Can JDK-8210776 be made public?
> >>
> >> Hi,
> >>
> >> I probably could open it, but you'd likely be very disappointed.
> >> I am highly doubtful that there will be much that will help with a
> >> backport ..
> >> The jdk 12 change is already open and I think that is all you need :
> >> http://hg.openjdk.java.net/jdk/jdk/rev/8c7638601045
> >>
> >> -phil.
> >>
> >>
> >> On 11/21/19 1:21 AM, Lindenmaier, Goetz wrote:
> >>> Hi,
> >>>
> >>> sorry, resending this to get a thread of it's own.
> >>>
> >>> Is it possible to open JDK-8210776?
> >>> I see that JDK-8230782 was downported to 11.0.6-oracle and
> >>> conclude that JDK-8210776 was downported, too.
> >>> It would ease downporting if the bug was open.
> >>>
> >>> Also, thanks JDK-8224505 was opened up!
> >>>
> >>> Best regards,
> >>>     Goetz.
> >>>>> -----Original Message-----
> >>>>> From: jesper.wilhelmsson at oracle.com
> >> <jesper.wilhelmsson at oracle.com>
> >>>>> Sent: Montag, 4. November 2019 18:06
> >>>>> To: Lindenmaier, Goetz<goetz.lindenmaier at sap.com>
> >>>>> Cc: Ioi Lam<ioi.lam at oracle.com>; jdk-dev at openjdk.java.net
> >>>>> Subject: Re: JDK-8029528
> >>>>>
> >>>>> We have an internal policy saying that any change in the open code
> >> should
> >>>>> have an open JBS issue, so in theory there shouldn't be any reviews for
> >> closed
> >>>>> issues on the open lists. If this is happening (enough to be a problem) I'd
> >> be
> >>>>> happy to take that discussion internally, so please let me know.
> >>>>>
> >>>>> As for closed bug ids in the problemList this is mainly the result of issues
> >> that
> >>>>> was moved from closed problemList to open as part of opening different
> >>>>> features like JFR, ZGC and others. These bugs should be opened a far as
> >> it is
> >>>>> possible. I think creating a new open bug and close the old one as a
> >> duplicate
> >>>> is
> >>>>> a good solution if the old bug can't be opened.
> >>>>>
> >>>>> /Jesper
> >>>>>