Anybody working on a solution to the mailing list problems (a.k.a JDK-8213225)?

Langer, Christoph christoph.langer at sap.com
Thu Apr 9 06:37:24 UTC 2020


Hi all,

thanks for your replies, kind of confirming THE problem or at least confirming that there IS a problem.

It would be good if somebody from the Oracle infrastructure team could come forward, sharing their current status/view of the issue. Or if somebody could get into direct contact with me to help debugging the problem.

I feel a bit ignored and left alone from that side, actually, although I think that's an important problem for the OpenJDK community to solve...

Best regards
Christoph



> -----Original Message-----
> From: Florian Weimer <fw at deneb.enyo.de>
> Sent: Donnerstag, 19. März 2020 20:40
> To: Langer, Christoph <christoph.langer at sap.com>
> Cc: jdk-dev at openjdk.java.net; ops at openjdk.java.net
> Subject: Re: Anybody working on a solution to the mailing list problems (a.k.a
> JDK-8213225)?
> 
> * Christoph Langer:
> 
> > [1] https://mail.openjdk.java.net/pipermail/core-libs-dev/2020-
> March/065046.html
> 
> I can't prove it, but I think this message fails DKIM verification
> because Mailman stripped a text/html part which was present in the
> original.  It's a conjecture based on this header:
> 
> X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.17
> 
> Obviously, that invalidates the signature on the message body.  Other
> lists simply reject messages with text/html parts.
> 
> > [2] https://mail.openjdk.java.net/pipermail/jdk-updates-dev/2020-
> March/002642.html
> 
> Looks similar.
> 
> > [3] https://mail.openjdk.java.net/pipermail/jdk-updates-dev/2020-
> March/002735.html
> 
> I did not receive this message either, and I do not do any DKIM
> checking, so that could be something else.  I looked for the message
> ID, <65c770e4-6f99-4c40-9f27-9a60d36c5085.maoliang.ml at alibaba-inc.com>
> in the logs of the outer mail relay, and I could not find a trace of
> it, either.


More information about the jdk-dev mailing list