CFV: New JDK Committer: Manukumar V S
Magnus Ihse Bursie
magnus.ihse.bursie at oracle.com
Thu Apr 7 15:21:42 UTC 2022
I must say I agree with Vladimir in being hesitant towards voting for
this. I looked at the list of the 20 contributions. All of them were
committed in a very short timespan, and all of them were newly written
regression tests for bugs that appeared in the JDK 1.4 to 1.5 timespan
(at least for those I checked, but afaict all of them refer to bugs in
the JDK-45xxxxx to JDK-46xxxxx range, which is waaaay old).
I'm not agreeing that this lives up to the bar for substantial
contributions required to become a JDK Committer.
I'm not voting veto at this point, but I'm asking you to reconsider your
nomination, and perhaps withdraw it for the time being. You can
re-nominate when Manukumar has been with the project for more than just
a few weeks, and contributed more relevant code than just some tests for
20 year old (!) bugs.
/Magnus
On 2022-04-06 15:23, Aleksei Ivanov wrote:
> I hereby nominate Manukumar V S (mvs) [1] to JDK Committer.
>
> Manukumar is a member of the Java Quality Engineering team at Oracle
> and has already contributed 20 changesets [2] to the OpenJDK project.
>
> Votes are due by 12:00 UTC April 21st, 2022.
>
> Only current JDK Committers [3] are eligible to vote on this
> nomination. Votes must be cast in the open by replying to this mailing
> list.
>
> For Lazy Consensus voting instructions, see [4].
>
>
> Best regards,
> Alexey
>
> [1] https://openjdk.java.net/census#mvs
> [2]
> https://github.com/openjdk/jdk/search?q=author-name%3A%22Manukumar+V+S%22+repo%3Aopenjdk%2Fjdk&type=commits&s=committer-date&o=desc
> [3] https://openjdk.java.net/census#jdk
> [4] http://openjdk.java.net/bylaws#lazy-consensus
More information about the jdk-dev
mailing list