Obsoleting JavaCritical
Alan Bateman
Alan.Bateman at oracle.com
Sun Jun 5 20:02:37 UTC 2022
On 05/06/2022 10:31, Wojciech Kudla wrote:
> :
>
> JavaCritical is an important part of making Java successful in high
> performance-focused areas and taking a step back with more restrictive
> approach in Panama would be a blow to the perception of the platform and
> its value in our field. I'd be more than happy to provide more context if
> needed. I realize things are fluid and there's probably still a lot of work
> in progress, but wanted to make you guys aware JavaCritical is not some
> forgotten feature no one uses. There's a whole industry and scientific
> research that relies on this.
>
As I recall, this was a JDK internal and undocumented jetpack used by
code such as the Solaris ucrypto provider. It's unfortunate that it
found its way into answers on StackOverflow and code in important fields
starting to rely on it.
I think it would be best to start a discussion on panama-dev as the
desire to invoke syscalls that promise not to block is understood there.
-Alan
More information about the jdk-dev
mailing list