Anonymity and observability of unnamed classes (JEP 445)

[Attila Kelemen]

> If you want applications and jars, i think you are not "programming-in-the-small" as the JEP call it.
> As you notice, unnamed classes are not very suitable for what you want.

Maybe, but in some cases I might need that, if I'm indirectly calling
`java`, and need the jar. What I was considering is that I could have
used this for Apache Spark to create a script that packages this
simplified Java file, and then I could use this script to start these
unnamed classes, which could be very small. On a side note: I find it
even stranger now that the JEP does not consider this a new dialect,
but implicit static is a new dialect (despite the precedence for it in
the language), even though with implicit static it wouldn't have to be
unnamed to hide from others for being ashamed of itself.