New candidate JEP: 459: String Templates (Second Preview)

[David Alayachew]

Hello,

Thank you for your response!

Very insightful, especially about the 3 months and stabilization. Makes a
lot more sense how the 2 rounds of preview became the norm. That definitely
answers my question.

Also, I appreciate you putting in linking tags like that. That makes these
JEP's easier to talk about and dissect. Some of them can be very content
dense (like the JEP 12 lol). The more linking tags, the better.

Thank you for your time and help!
David Alayachew


On Mon, Oct 9, 2023, 9:03 AM Mark Reinhold <mark.reinhold at oracle.com> wrote:

> 2023/10/5 8:44:10 -0400, davidalayachew at gmail.com:
> > In the JEP, it says we are going another round to gather experience and
> > feedback, but with no changes.
> >
> > Out of curiosity, for JEP's like this where another round of preview is
> > done, but no changes have been made, what sort of feedback is wanted that
> > wasn't provided last time? Is it a quantity thing, where they just want
> > more people to respond before they send this out to the wild? Or do they
> > want more involved feedback from someone using this feature in a
> > non-trivial example? Or is it more of a sixth-sense/feel-it-out sort of
> > thing?
>
> https://openjdk.org/jeps/12#Readiness
> https://openjdk.org/jeps/12#Re-preview
>
> - Mark
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://mail.openjdk.org/pipermail/jdk-dev/attachments/20231009/a2e7bf4e/attachment.htm>