<!DOCTYPE html><html><head>
<meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=utf-8">
</head>
<body>
On 08/12/2023 01:47, Bruno Borges wrote:<br>
<blockquote type="cite" cite="mid:MN2PR21MB1437043968CE30AC00294B4E858AA@MN2PR21MB1437.namprd21.prod.outlook.com">
<style type="text/css" style="display:none;">P {margin-top:0;margin-bottom:0;}</style>
<div><span style="font-family: Aptos, Aptos_EmbeddedFont, Aptos_MSFontService, Calibri, Helvetica, sans-serif; font-size: 11pt; color: rgb(0, 0, 0);">>
</span><span style="letter-spacing: normal; font-family: "Segoe UI", "Segoe UI Web (West European)", "Segoe UI", -apple-system, BlinkMacSystemFont, Roboto, "Helvetica Neue", sans-serif; font-size: 15px; font-weight: 400; color: rgb(36, 36, 36); background-color: rgb(255, 255, 255);">Although
I guess if they’re not updating to newer Windows (and
hardware), they may not be upgrading Java without 32bit
Windows support either.</span></div>
<div class="elementToProof"><span style="letter-spacing: normal; font-family: "DejaVu Sans", "Bitstream Vera Sans", "Luxi Sans", Verdana, Arial, Helvetica; font-size: 10pt; color: rgb(0, 0, 0);"><br>
</span></div>
<div class="elementToProof"><span style="font-family: "DejaVu Sans", "Bitstream Vera Sans", "Luxi Sans", Verdana, Arial, Helvetica; font-size: 10pt; color: rgb(0, 0, 0);">This
thinking was part of the logic behind JEP 449.</span></div>
<br>
</blockquote>
<br>
Are you, or someone else from Microsoft, planning to propose the
removal of the port as a follow on from JEP 449 ?<br>
<br>
-Alan<br>
</body>
</html>