<!DOCTYPE html><html><head>
<meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=utf-8">
</head>
<body>
On 20/12/2023 23:11, Jim Laskey wrote:<br>
<blockquote type="cite" cite="mid:5FF5A67F-D151-43FE-93D8-4FD5133B4F94@oracle.com">
<pre class="moz-quote-pre" wrap="">Vote: veto
This is the time of the year when many committers are on holidays and not available to vote. Please renominate in January when you can get a reasonable number of voters. Thank you.
</pre>
</blockquote>
The timing of this vote is indeed awkward as many Committers do shut
down for this time of the year. A CFV requires the nominator to be
responsive to questions or objections during the voting period so
this one requires Roman to be responsive during this time too. I
don't think CFV timing has been used as a veto justification before
now. In any case, it means Roman needs to convince Jim to recast his
vote, or else withdraw the nomination and start another CFV in the
new year.<br>
<br>
-Alan<br>
</body>
</html>