From rob.mckenna at oracle.com Thu Oct 26 17:46:09 2017 From: rob.mckenna at oracle.com (Rob McKenna) Date: Thu, 26 Oct 2017 18:46:09 +0100 Subject: Welcome to the JDK Updates Project! Message-ID: <20171026174609.GD21654@vimes> All subscribers to the jdk8u-dev mailing list are now subscribed to this new list, jdk-updates-dev. The Authors, Committers and Reviewers of this project [1] will be anyone who holds a role in the JDK 8 Updates, JDK 9 or JDK 10 projects and has contributed at least one changeset. The most senior role across those Projects will be granted in this Project, as proposed [2]. A JDK Updates project page [3] is being prepared and should be available soon. The initial forest for this project is available [4] and is based on the JDK9 project [5]. You can monitor the jdk-updates-changes alias [6] for mercurial push notifications. This forest has been updated with the sources for JDK 9.0.1. -Rob [1] http://openjdk.java.net/census#jdk-updates [2] http://mail.openjdk.java.net/pipermail/announce/2017-September/000232.html [3] http://openjdk.java.net/projects/jdk-updates/ [4] http://hg.openjdk.java.net/jdk-updates/jdk9u [5] http://openjdk.java.net/projects/jdk9/ [6] http://mail.openjdk.java.net/mailman/listinfo/jdk-updates-changes From gnu.andrew at redhat.com Thu Oct 26 19:35:20 2017 From: gnu.andrew at redhat.com (Andrew Hughes) Date: Thu, 26 Oct 2017 20:35:20 +0100 Subject: Welcome to the JDK Updates Project! In-Reply-To: <20171026174609.GD21654@vimes> References: <20171026174609.GD21654@vimes> Message-ID: On 26 October 2017 at 18:46, Rob McKenna wrote: > All subscribers to the jdk8u-dev mailing list are now subscribed to this new > list, jdk-updates-dev. > > The Authors, Committers and Reviewers of this project [1] will be anyone who > holds a role in the JDK 8 Updates, JDK 9 or JDK 10 projects and has > contributed at least one changeset. The most senior role across those > Projects will be granted in this Project, as proposed [2]. > > A JDK Updates project page [3] is being prepared and should be available > soon. > > The initial forest for this project is available [4] and is based on the > JDK9 project [5]. You can monitor the jdk-updates-changes alias [6] for > mercurial push notifications. This forest has been updated with the > sources for JDK 9.0.1. > > -Rob > > [1] http://openjdk.java.net/census#jdk-updates > [2] http://mail.openjdk.java.net/pipermail/announce/2017-September/000232.html > [3] http://openjdk.java.net/projects/jdk-updates/ > [4] http://hg.openjdk.java.net/jdk-updates/jdk9u > [5] http://openjdk.java.net/projects/jdk9/ > [6] http://mail.openjdk.java.net/mailman/listinfo/jdk-updates-changes It was necessary to disable jcheck locally to pull in the 9.0.1 update: pulling from http://hg.openjdk.java.net/jdk-updates/jdk9u/jdk searching for changes adding changesets adding manifests adding file changes added 47 changesets with 169 changes to 120 files [jcheck @VERSION@ @DATE@] > Changeset: 17328:d97d61997b91 > Author: robm > Date: 2017-08-24 21:14 > > 8174109: Better queuing priorities > Reviewed-by: smarks Bugid 8174109 already used in this repository, in revision 17325 Once the 8183297 jcheck configuration update is pulled in, this is no longer an issue and jcheck can be re-enabled. -- Andrew :) Senior Free Java Software Engineer Red Hat, Inc. (http://www.redhat.com) Web Site: http://fuseyism.com Twitter: https://twitter.com/gnu_andrew_java PGP Key: ed25519/0xCFDA0F9B35964222 (hkp://keys.gnupg.net) Fingerprint = 5132 579D D154 0ED2 3E04 C5A0 CFDA 0F9B 3596 4222 From neugens at redhat.com Mon Oct 30 13:10:07 2017 From: neugens at redhat.com (Mario Torre) Date: Mon, 30 Oct 2017 14:10:07 +0100 Subject: Request for Approval: Backport of JDK-8188030: AWT java apps fail to start when some minimal fonts are present Message-ID: Hi all, I would like to backport the fix for: https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8188030 to http://hg.openjdk.java.net/jdk-updates/jdk9u/ The fix is the same as OpenJDK10 [1] and applies cleanly: http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~neugens/8188030/webrev.01 I'm not sure if I need to manually create a backport request on the bug database, I remember that that was done automatically but it doesn't seem like it has been created yet. Cheers, Mario [1] http://hg.openjdk.java.net/jdk10/client/rev/d5a1cde89944 From gnu.andrew at redhat.com Mon Oct 30 14:57:56 2017 From: gnu.andrew at redhat.com (Andrew Hughes) Date: Mon, 30 Oct 2017 14:57:56 +0000 Subject: Request for Approval: Backport of JDK-8188030: AWT java apps fail to start when some minimal fonts are present In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: On 30 October 2017 at 13:10, Mario Torre wrote: ... > > I'm not sure if I need to manually create a backport request on the > bug database, I remember that that was done automatically but it > doesn't seem like it has been created yet. > It's usually automatically created when the change is pushed to the 8u or 9u repository. -- Andrew :) Senior Free Java Software Engineer Red Hat, Inc. (http://www.redhat.com) Web Site: http://fuseyism.com Twitter: https://twitter.com/gnu_andrew_java PGP Key: ed25519/0xCFDA0F9B35964222 (hkp://keys.gnupg.net) Fingerprint = 5132 579D D154 0ED2 3E04 C5A0 CFDA 0F9B 3596 4222