jdk11u 11.0.2 updates process/schedule for builds?

[Rob McKenna]

On 06/12/18 16:10, Andrew Leonard wrote:
> Thanks Rob, I think I am getting it now :-)
> So to summarize my understanding:
>     - jdk-updates/jdk11u  repo is available for openjdk community fixes to 
> be contributed if deemed required for the next jdk11.0.2 release, but no 
> regular builds are produced/tagged from that.
>     - <the internal jdk11u CPU security repo> where the security patches 
> are developed, regularly merges in updates from the jdk-updates/jdk11u 
> public repo, and it is in this internal repo where regular 
> "builds"(tagged) are created by the internal team.
>     - At jdk11.0.2 GA the <internal jdk11 CPU security repo> is merged 
> into the jdk-updates/jdk11u public repo
> 
> Does that sound correct?

Yep!

    -Rob

> 
> Cheers
> Andrew
> 
> Andrew Leonard
> Java Runtimes Development
> IBM Hursley
> IBM United Kingdom Ltd
> Phone internal: 245913, external: 01962 815913
> internet email: andrew_m_leonard at uk.ibm.com 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> From:   Rob McKenna <rob.mckenna at oracle.com>
> To:     Andrew Leonard <andrew_m_leonard at uk.ibm.com>
> Cc:     jdk-updates-dev at openjdk.java.net
> Date:   06/12/2018 15:38
> Subject:        Re: jdk11u 11.0.2 updates process/schedule for builds?
> 
> 
> 
> Hey Andrew,
> 
> No problem.
> 
> On 06/12/18 14:14, Andrew Leonard wrote:
> > Thanks for the info Rob. That was my thoughts as well that 11.0.1/2 
> would 
> > be CPU security fixes only and merged once they are ready..., however 
> what 
> > i'm a little confused by is that looking at the mercurial log for jdk11u 
> 
> > shows ~60 changesets beyond the jdk-11.0.1+13 tag, so I am guessing 
> these 
> > are non-CPU fixes...? This maybe related to the discussion Volker raised 
> 
> > last month here, not sure I quite understood the resolution on that one?
> > 
> > So for example the fix for this backport (
> > 
> https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8214859
> ) was merged into jdk11u 
> > yesterday, even though it's targetted for 11.0.3?
> 
> The purpose of this repo is to collect OpenJDK fixes submitted by the
> community for inclusion into the next release. Security changes are
> handled separately and published on the GA of the release.
> 
> > 
> > Given the extensive set of non-CPU fixes, would we look to label a new 
> > build level with these at some point?
> 
> Build tags from the cpu repository (the one containing the security
> fixes) will also be synced at GA. Fixes from
> http://hg.openjdk.java.net/jdk-updates/jdk11u 
> are regularly merged into
> this repository.
> 
>     -Rob
> 
> > 
> > Thanks
> > Andrew
> > 
> > Andrew Leonard
> > Java Runtimes Development
> > IBM Hursley
> > IBM United Kingdom Ltd
> > Phone internal: 245913, external: 01962 815913
> > internet email: andrew_m_leonard at uk.ibm.com 
> > 
> > 
> > 
> > 
> > From:   Rob McKenna <rob.mckenna at oracle.com>
> > To:     Andrew Leonard <andrew_m_leonard at uk.ibm.com>
> > Cc:     jdk-updates-dev at openjdk.java.net
> > Date:   05/12/2018 18:59
> > Subject:        Re: jdk11u 11.0.2 updates process/schedule for builds?
> > 
> > 
> > 
> > On 05/12/18 13:29, Andrew Leonard wrote:
> > > Hi,
> > > I'd just like to query the 11.0.2 updates process in the 
> > > jdk-updates/jdk11u repo. I've noticed there have been no tagged builds 
> 
> > as 
> > > yet for 11.0.2, is that normal?
> > 
> > It is. 11.0.1/2 are cpu releases containing security fixes.
> > 
> > > or are those builds in the Oracle managed 
> > > "internal-repo" for 11.0.2? Is there a merge schedule for builds, or 
> > will 
> > > they all suddenly appear closer to the GA for 11.0.2?
> > 
> > The build tags will not be made available until just after GA when the
> > contents of the release are pushed to the open repo.
> > 
> >    -Rob
> > 
> > > Thanks
> > > Andrew
> > > 
> > > Andrew Leonard
> > > Java Runtimes Development
> > > IBM Hursley
> > > IBM United Kingdom Ltd
> > > Phone internal: 245913, external: 01962 815913
> > > internet email: andrew_m_leonard at uk.ibm.com 
> > > 
> > > 
> > > Unless stated otherwise above:
> > > IBM United Kingdom Limited - Registered in England and Wales with 
> number 
> > 
> > > 741598. 
> > > Registered office: PO Box 41, North Harbour, Portsmouth, Hampshire PO6 
> 
> > 3AU
> > 
> > 
> > 
> > 
> > 
> > Unless stated otherwise above:
> > IBM United Kingdom Limited - Registered in England and Wales with number 
> 
> > 741598. 
> > Registered office: PO Box 41, North Harbour, Portsmouth, Hampshire PO6 
> 3AU
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> Unless stated otherwise above:
> IBM United Kingdom Limited - Registered in England and Wales with number 
> 741598. 
> Registered office: PO Box 41, North Harbour, Portsmouth, Hampshire PO6 3AU