Future jdk9u updates & 9-critical-request

[Andrew Haley]

On 25/01/18 18:19, Martin Buchholz wrote:
> There is enough interest in jdk9 that at least minimal community
> maintenance should be possible.

Maybe.  I have no interest in doing it because I believe that the
LTS/STS model is a good one, so the STS releases really should be short
term.  I don't mind being jdk9u lead for the ten minutes it takes to
fix the breakage and tag the tree for a release.

-- 
Andrew Haley
Java Platform Lead Engineer
Red Hat UK Ltd. <https://www.redhat.com>
EAC8 43EB D3EF DB98 CC77 2FAD A5CD 6035 332F A671