Outdated JDK 10 fix request process page?

[Severin Gehwolf]

Hi Rob,

On Wed, 2018-05-02 at 16:15 +0100, Rob McKenna wrote:
> Hi Severin,
> 
> The jdk & jdk-updates projects are considered separate.

OK.

> I personally like the idea of keeping the old JDK fix process pages
> around for archival purposes, but perhaps it would make sense to add a
> link pointing to the newer updates processes once the JDK release GA's.
> Hopefully this would solve your issue?

That sounds good.

Just to clarify my point of view. I'm an OpenJDK contributor and I need
to look up documents to find the right process to get fixes in. If
there are more than one document describing the fix process for the
same release, I get confused. In this instance it's Then I'd be better
off to ask what the the right way of doing things in terms of process
is. That adds to the burden of both, contributors and maintainers. For
that reason I think it would be a good idea if deprecated documents can
be marked as such possibly linking to the document which superceeded
it.

Thanks,
Severin

>     -Rob
> 
> On 02/05/18 15:19, Severin Gehwolf wrote:
> > Hi,
> > 
> > I came across an old fix request page today:
> > http://openjdk.java.net/projects/jdk/10/fix-request-process
> > 
> > It seems the above has been superceeded by:
> > http://openjdk.java.net/projects/jdk-updates/approval.html
> > 
> > I wonder whether jdk/10/fix-request-process should get updated to
> > redirect to jdk-updates/approval.html or some other form of
> > consolidation is in order. Thoughts?
> > 
> > Thanks,
> > Severin